Legislature(1999 - 2000)
03/20/2000 01:10 PM House RES
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HJR 59-SUPPORT WILDLIFE & SPORT FISH RESTOR.ACT CO-CHAIR MASEK announced that the first order of business would be HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 59, Supporting the passage by the United States Congress of H.R. 3671, the Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Programs Improvement Act of 2000. Number 0180 LORALI MEIER, Staff to Representative Masek, Alaska State Legislature, read the sponsor statement into the record as follows: HJR 59 demonstrates the legislature's support for the proper use and management of money in the Pittman- Robertson and Dingell-Johnson Trust Funds. The Dingell-Johnson Trust Fund levies a 10 percent tax on all sportfishing equipment, motor boat fuel, and some boat imports. The Pittman-Robertson Trust Fund levies an 11 percent excise tax on sporting arms and ammunition, and a 10 percent tax on handguns. Both acts mandate that the money generated from the taxes be reapportioned back to the state in the form of grants for programs that benefit fish and wildlife. Last year Congressman Don Young requested the General Accounting Office to audit the Pittman-Robertson Trust Fund. Uncovered was waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement. Instances include expensive foreign travel junkets and large bonuses for some U.S. Fish and Wildlife employees. One career U.S. Fish and Wildlife employee testified before ... Congressman Young's committee that he was pressured to approve handouts of Pittman-Robertson money to so-called "animal rights" groups that have actively worked to destroy hunting. Last year about 15 percent of Alaskans purchased hunting licenses and about 30 percent purchased sportfishing licenses. This minority deserves the benefits of the Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson Trust Funds to protect their rights and interests. Number 0353 REPRESENTATIVE COWDERY asked whether this money that is returned to the state as grants would be placed in the general fund or would have to be appropriated. MS. MEIER deferred to Representative Barnes. REPRESENTATIVE BARNES answered that this money would have to be appropriated. She noted that in the past this money has been abused here [in Alaska] because these are primarily sport fishing and sport hunting funds. In the past some of these funds have been appropriated to the Division of Commercial Fisheries. REPRESENTATIVE COWDERY asked if there is any way to ensure that these funds are not abused. REPRESENTATIVE BARNES pointed out that these funds are audited from time to time, as HJR 59 indicates. If there are abuses, the states that abuse the funds are held accountable. In further response to Representative Cowdery, Representative Barnes said that the only way to ensure there are no abuses would be to ensure that the Finance committees that appropriate these monies adhere to the intent and letter of the law. Number 0530 REPRESENTATIVE JOULE asked: When the subcommittees of the Alaska Department of Fish & Game review these funds, could they take the opportunity to closely scrutinize the use of the funds? REPRESENTATIVE BARNES replied yes. When the subcommittees have these funds before them, the origins of the funds are identified as well as what the funds are supposed to be appropriated for. CO-CHAIR MASEK asked whether anyone wished to testify; no one came forward. Number 0620 REPRESENTATIVE BARNES made a motion to move HJR 59 out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal note. She requested unanimous consent. There being no objection, HJR 59 was moved from the House Resources Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|